Torsion of a base-isolated building subjected to rotational components of earthquakes

Structural mechanics
Authors:
Abstract:

This research focuses on seismically isolated buildings, specifically, the influence of the rotational components of seismic ground motion on the buildings' torsional response. Current approaches to ensuring the earthquake resistance of buildings and structures using seismic isolation are usually based on analyzing the impact of only the translational components of ground motion. The authors hypothesize that the rotational components of seismic action may, in certain cases, significantly affect a structure’s dynamic response. The primary research method involves conducting numerical experiments. The rotational component of seismic motion was simulated using a synthetic accelerogram generated according to Newmark’s model from two translational components of seismic motion. Two mathematical models are developed: a three-degree-of-freedom model for buildings supported on lead rubber bearings and a four-degree-of-freedom model for structures located on pendulum bearings equipped with plastic dampers. Analysis reveals that seismic rotations, particularly on soft soils, significantly amplify torsional effects. The accelerations at the corner points of the superstructure can increase significantly: up to 4 times for lead rubber bearings and up to 3 times for pendulum bearings compared to the accelerations at the center of mass. Furthermore, displacements in the corner isolators exceed the center of mass displacement by up to 16% for lead rubber bearings and up to 5 times for pendulum systems. Between the two considered seismic isolation systems (elastomeric and pendulum isolators), the rotational components of seismic action exert the greatest effect on the dynamic response of a building isolated by pendulum bearings. This circumstance should be taken into account when designing buildings with a seismic isolation system exhibiting low torsional stiffness.

  • References

    1.   Hart, G.C., Lew, M., DiJulio, R.M. Torsional Response of High Rise Buildings. Journal of Structural Division ASCE. 1975. 101. Pp. 397–416.

    2.   Mitchell, D., Tinawi, R., Redwood, R.G. Damage to buildings due to 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake – a Canadian code perspective. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 1990. 17(5). Pp. 813–834. DOI: 10.1139/l90-093

    3.   Mitchell, D., DeVall, R.H., Saatcioglu, M., Simpson, R., Tinawi, R., Tremblay, R. Damage to concrete structures due to the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 1995. 22(2). Pp. 361–377. DOI: 10.1139/l95-047

    4.   Mitchell, D., DeVall, R.H., Kobayashi, K., Tinawi, R., Tso, W.K. Damage to concrete structures due to the Jan 17, 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) Earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 1996. 23(3). Pp. 757–770. DOI: 10.1139/l96-886

    5.   Stone, W.C., Yokel, F.Y., Celebi, M., Hanks, Th., Leyendecker, E.V. Engineering Aspects of the September 19, 1985 Mexico Earthquake. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, 1987. 224 p. URL: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/BSS/nbsbuildingscience165.pdf (date of application: 30.07.2026).

    6.   Chopra, A.K., De La Llera, J.C. Accidental and natural torsion in earthquake response and design of buildings. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference Earthquake Engineering. Paper No. 2006. Research Center, University of California, 1996. URL: https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/11_2006.PDF (date of application: 30.07.2026).

    7.   Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Kyrkos, M.T., Stathopoulos, K.G. Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: Critical review and state of the art. Earthquakes and Structures. 2015. 8(2). Pp. 305–377. DOI: 10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.305

    8.   Smerzini, C., Paolucci, R., Stupazzini, M. Experimental and Numerical Results on Earthquake-Induced Rotational Ground Motions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2009. 13(sup1). Pp. 66–82. DOI: 10.1080/13632460902813299

    9.   Newmark, N.M. Torsion in symmetrical building. Proceedings of the 4th world conference on earthquake engineering. Santiago, 1969. Pp. 19–32. URL: https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/4_vol2_A3-19.pdf (date of application: 30.07.2026).

    10. Nazarov, Y.P., Poznyak, E., Filimonov, A.V. (2015). A brief theory and computing of seismic ground rotations for structural analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 71. Pp. 31–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.013

    11. Conţiu, M., Ghiocel, D.M., Creţu, D. (2018). Soil-structure interaction and motion incoherency effects on a concrete bridge with deep foundations. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 399(1). Article no. 012010. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/399/1/012010

    12. Conțiu, M., Ghiocel, D.M., Crețu, D., Botiș, M.F. A Step-by-Step Probabilistic Seismic Soil–Structure Interaction Analysis with Ground Motion Incoherency for a Bridge Pier on Bored Pile Foundations. Applied Sciences. 2022. 12(4). Article no. 1828. DOI: 10.3390/app12041828

    13. Abrahamson, N.A. Generation of spatially incoherent strong motion time histories. Earthquake Engineering. 10th World Conference. Balkema. Rotterdam, 1992. Pp. 845–850. URL: https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/10_vol2_845.pdf (date of application: 30.07.2026).

    14. Abrahamson, N.A. Hard-rock coherency functions based on the Pinyon Flat array data. ADAMS Accession No. ML071980104. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Bethesda, MD, 2007. URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0907/ML090771277.pdf#2#1 (date of application: 30.07.2026).

    15. Veeraraghavan, S., Coleman, J. Effect of non-vertically propagating earthquake waves and nonlinear soil-structure interaction on nuclear facility response. Transactions. SMiRT-25. Division III. Charlotte, NC, 2019. URL: https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/3fa40887-cf2e-49c3-9935-4e7196ea3e16/content (date of application: 30.07.2026).

    16. Ghiocel, D.M. (2019). Extending SASSI methodology to seismic SSI analysis for NPP buildings on soil deposits with inclined layering Transactions. SMiRT-25. Division III. Charlotte, NC, 2019. URL: https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6cc2b667-d98f-4e32-b8e5-cc58922a7a27/content (date of application: 30.07.2026).

    17. Luco, J.E. Torsional response of structures for SH-waves: the case of hemispherical foundations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1976. 66. Pp. 109–123. DOI: 10.1785/BSSA0660010109

    18. Shibata, H.T., Shigeta, T., Sone, A. A note of some results of observation of torsional ground motions and their response analysis. Bulletin of the Earthquake Resistant Structure Research Center. 1976. 10. 43–47.

    19. Lee, V.W., Trifunac, M.D. Torsional accelerograms. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 1985. 4(3). Pp. 132–138.

    20. Lee, V.W., Trifunac, M.D. Rocking strong earthquake accelerations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 1987. 6(2). Pp. 75–89.

    21. Todorovska, M.I., Trifunac, M.D., Lee, V.W., Orbović, N. Synthetic earthquake ground motions on an array. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2013. 48. Pp. 234–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.020

    22. Basu, D., Whittaker, A.S., Constantinou, M.C. (2015). Characterizing rotational components of earthquake ground motion using a surface distribution method and response of sample structures. Engineering Structures. 99. Pp. 685–707. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.029

    23. Rasskazovsky, V.T. Lokal’naya model seismicheskogo polya I uglovye peremescheniya sooruzhenii [A local model of seismic field and angular displacements of structures]. Bulletin of Engineering Seismology. 1989. 13. Pp. 5–13.

    24. Hachiyan, E.E. Prikladnaya seismologiya [Applied seismology]. Erevan: Gitutyun NAN RA. 491 p.

    25. Nikolaenko, N.A., Nazarov, Y.P. Dinamika i seysmostoikost’ sooruzheniy [Dynamics and seismic resistance of structures]. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1988. 308 p.

    26. Nazarov, Y.P. Analiticheskie osnovy rascheta sooruzheniy na seysmicheskie vozdeystviya [The analytical calculation fundamentals of constructions on seismic loads]. Moscow: Nauka, 2010. 414 p.

    27. Sbaa, S., Hollender, F., Perron, V., Imtiaz, A., Bard, P.-Y., Mariscal, A., Cochard, A., Dujardin, A. (2017). Analysis of rotation sensor data from the SINAPS@ Kefalonia (Greece) post-seismic experiment–link to surface geology and wavefield characteristics. Earth, Planets and Space. 69(1). Article no. 124. DOI: 10.1186/s40623-017-0711-6

    28. Liu, C.C., Huang, B.S., Lee, W.H.K., Lin, C.J. Observing Rotational and Translational Ground Motions at the HGSD Station in Taiwan from 2007 to 2008. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2009. 99(2B). Pp. 1228–1236. DOI: 10.1785/0120080156

    29. Takeo, M. (1998). Ground rotational motions recorded in near-source region of earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters. 25(6). Pp. 789–792. DOI: 10.1029/98GL00511

    30. Yin, J., Nigbor, R.L., Chen, Q., Steidl, J. (2016). Engineering analysis of measured rotational ground motions at GVDA. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 87. Pp. 125–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.05.007

    31. Smerzini, C., Paolucci, R., Stupazzini, M. Experimental and Numerical Results on Earthquake-Induced Rotational Ground Motions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2009. 13(sup1). Pp. 66–82. DOI: 10.1080/13632460902813299

    32. Ringler, A.T., Anthony, R.E., Holland, A.A., Wilson, D.C., Lin, C.J. Observations of Rotational Motions from Local Earthquakes Using Two Temporary Portable Sensors in Waynoka, Oklahoma. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2018. 108(6). Pp. 3562–3575. DOI: 10.1785/0120170347

    33. Rodda, G.K., Basu, D. On Conditional Simulation of Spatially Varying Rotational Ground Motion. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2021. 25(6). Pp. 1191–1226. DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1573158

    34. Niazi, M. Inferred displacements, velocities and rotations of a long rigid foundation located at el centro differential array site during the 1979 imperial valley, california, earthquake. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 1986. 14(4). Pp. 531–542. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290140404

    35. Singh, S.K., Santoyo, M., Bodin, P., Gomberg, J. Dynamic deformations of shallow sediments in the Valley of Mexico, Part II: Single-station estimates. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1997. 87(3). Pp. 540–550. DOI: 10.1785/bssa0870030540

    36. Ghayamghamian, M.R., Nouri, G.R. On the characteristics of ground motion rotational components using Chiba dense array data. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2007. 36(10). Pp. 1407–1429. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.687

    37. Spudich, P., Fletcher, J.B. Erratum to Observation and prediction of dynamic ground strains, tilts, and torsions caused by the Mw 6.0 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake and aftershocks, derived from upsar array observations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2010. 100(5A). Pp. 2348–2352. DOI: 10.1785/0120100138

    38. Basu, D., Whittaker, A.S., Constantinou, M.C. Extracting rotational components of earthquake ground motion using data recorded at multiple stations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2013. 42(3). Pp. 451–468. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2233

    39. Castellani, A., Boffi, G. Rotational components of the surface ground motion during an earthquake. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 1986. 14(5). Pp. 751–767. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290140506

    40. Hao, H. Characteristics of torsional ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1996. 25(6). Pp. 599–610. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199606)25:6<599::AID-EQE571>3.0.CO;2-2

    41. Castellani, A., Zembaty, Z. Comparison between earthquake rotation spectra obtained by different experimental sources. Engineering Structures. 1996. 18(8). Pp. 597–603. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00189-1

    42. Basu, D., Whittaker, A.S., Constantinou, M.C. Estimating Rotational Components of Ground Motion Using Data Recorded at a Single Station. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 2012. 138(9). Pp. 1141–1156. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000408

    43. Almazán, J.L., de la Llera, J.C. Accidental torsion due to overturning in nominally symmetric structures isolated with the FPS. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2003. 32(6). Pp. 919–948. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.255

    44. Ryan, K.L., Chopra, A.K. Estimating bearing response in symmetric and asymmetric-plan isolated buildings with rocking and torsion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2006. 35(8). Pp. 1009–1036. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.569

    45. Shimazaki, K. Evaluation of Seismic Torsional Response of Base Isolated Buildings. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2012 (15WCEE). Curran Associates, Inc. Red Hook, NY, 2015. Pp. 762–771. URL: https://www.arch.kanagawa-u.ac.jp/lab/shimazaki_kazushi/shimazaki/paper/2012WCEE-165.pdf (date of application: 30.07.2026).

    46. Guéguen, P., Astorga, A. The Torsional Response of Civil Engineering Structures during Earthquake from an Observational Point of View. Sensors. 2021. 21(2). Article no. 342. DOI: 10.3390/s21020342

    47. Rutman, Y.L. Pendulum seismic isolation bearings. Design, analysis, experiment. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012. 1(27). Pp. 31–36. DOI: 10.5862/MCE.27.4

    48. Kovaleva, N.V., Rutman, Y.L. Estimation of efficiency of damping parameters in seismic insulation systems. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012. 1(27). Pp. 37–43. DOI: 10.5862/MCE.27.5

    49. Rutman, Y.L., Simbort, E., Bondarev, D.E. An analysis of the dynamics of seismically isolated structures taking into account its torsional vibrations. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2017. 6. Pp. 208–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.032

    50. Zhang, J., Qi, A., Yang, M. Multi-objective optimal design of asymmetric base-isolated structures using NSGA-II algorithm for improving torsional resistance. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2025. 24. Pp. 811–825. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-025-2338-0

    51. Chuan, Fu. Vibration control of TLCD-eccentric base isolated structure under seismic excitation. Structures. 2025. 73. Article no. 108217. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108217

    52. Özer, Es., Inel, M. The effect of single and combined use of base isolator and fluid viscous damper on seismic performance in a conventional RC building with torsional irregularity. Journal of Building Engineering. 2025. 101. Article no. 111898. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.111898

    53. Gudainiyan, J., Gupta, P. A comparative study on the response of the L-shaped base isolated multi-storey building to near and far field earthquake ground motion. Forces in Mechanics. 2023. 11. Article no. 100191. DOI: 10.1016/j.finmec.2023.100191

    54. Leblouba, M. Selection of seismic isolation system parameters for the near-optimal design of structures. Scientific Reports. 2022. 12. Article no. 14734. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19114-7

    55. Bratu, P., Dobre, D., Vasile, O., Dobrescu, C.-F. The Seismic Behavior of a Base-Isolated Building with Simultaneous Translational and Rotational Motions during an Earthquake. Buildings. 2024. 14(10). Article no. 3099. DOI: 10.3390/buildings14103099

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous article