Effect of microbial-induced calcite precipitation on hydraulic conductivity and strength of a sandy gypseous soil

Grounds and foundations, underground structures
Authors:
Abstract:

This work presents the effect of microbial induced calcite precipitation treatment on hydraulic conductivity and strength of a sandy gypseous soil with about 35% gypsum content. The cementitious material was produced from a bacterial suspension containing the bacterial strain Bacillus Pasteurii PTCC 1645, mixed with or added to a cementation solution having the molarities 0.25, 0.5, and 1 M and prepared from a number of typically used chemical substances. The work resulted in a number of important outcomes. The microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP treatment), which yielded about 15% calcite carbonate after 14 to 21 days of curing, can efficiently reduce the hydraulic conductivity, even for soils with high gypsum contents and relatively low fine content. In response to curing time increase from 7 to 21 days, the hydraulic conductivity decreased nearly twice. Likewise, as the calcite content increased to 15%, the hydraulic conductivity decreased by almost fourfold. On the compressive strength front, the MICP treated specimens showed a promising uniaxial compressive strength of up to 600 kPa. This further reinforces the perception that MICP treatment by the Bacillus Pasteurii strain can be used effectively in treating gypseous soils problems.

  • References

    1.     Al-Obaydi, Q.A.J. Studies in Geotechnical and Collapsible Characteristics of Gypseous Soil. MSc. Thesis. Civil Engineering. Department College of Engineering. Al-Mustansyria University. Baghdad, 2003. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33313.97124

    2.     Saleam, S.N. Geotechnical characteristics of gypseois sandy soil including the effect of contamination with some oil products. MSc. Thesis. University of Technology. Baghdad, 1988.

    3.     Al-Kaisi, M.M., Berrada, A., Stack, M. Evaluation of irrigation scheduling program and spring wheat yield response in southwestern Colorado. Agricultural Water Management. 1997. 34(2). Pp. 137–148.

    4.     Al-Sharrad, M.A.A. Effect of cut-back mc-60 on permeability and compressibility of a gypseous soil. Iraqi Journal of Civil Engineering. 2007. 4(7). Pp. 16–26. DOI: 10.37650/ijce.2007.14194

    5.     Ali, N.A., Karkush, M.O. Improvement of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soft Clay using Microbial Calcite Precipitates. Journal of Engineering. 2021. 27(3). Pp. 67–75. DOI: 10.31026/j.eng.2021.03.05

    6.     DeJong, J.T., Fritzges, M.B., Nüsslein, K. Microbially Induced Cementation to Control Sand Response to Undrained Shear. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2006. 132(11). Pp. 1381–1392. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1381)

    7.     Choi, S.G., Chu, J., Brown, R.C., Wang, K., Wen, Z. Sustainable biocement production via microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation: Use of limestone and acetic acid derived from pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Journal. 2017. 5(6). Pp. 5183–5190.

    8.     Liu, B., Zhu, C., Tang, C.S., Xie, Y.H., Yin, L.Y., Cheng, Q., et al. Bio-remediation of desiccation cracking in clayey soils through microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP). Engineering Geology. 2020. 264. Article no. 105389. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105389

    9.     Karkush, M., Ali, N.A. Electrokinetic enhancement of microbial induced calcite precipitation used in improving the shear strength of soft clay. Smart Geotechnics for Smart Societies. CRC Press, 2023. p. 155–163. DOI: 10.1201/9781003299127-14

    10.   Tang, C.S., Yin, L.-Y., Jiang, N.-J., Zhu, C., Zeng, H., Li, H., She, B. Factors affecting the performance of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) treated soil: a review. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2020. 79(5). Article no. 94. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-020-8840-9

    11.   Choi, S.G., Chang, I., Lee, M., Lee, J.H., Han, J.T., Kwon, T.H. Review on geotechnical engineering properties of sands treated by microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) and biopolymers. Construction and Building Materials. 2020. 246. Article no. 118415. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118415

    12.   Li, M., Cheng, X., Yang, Z., Guo, H. Breeding high-yield urease-producing Sporosarcina pasteurii strain by NTG mutation. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology. 2013. 15(6). Pp. 130–134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0864.2013.06.19

    13.   Baumgartner, L.K., Reid, R.P., Dupraz, C., Decho, A.W., Buckley, D.H., Spear, J.R., Przekopal, K.M., Visscher, P.T. Sulfate reducing bacteria in microbial mats: changing paradigms, new discoveries. Sedimentary Geology. 2006. 185(3–4). Pp. 131–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.12.008

    14.   Van Paassen, L.A., Ghose, R., van der Linden, T.J.M., van der Star, W.R.L., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J Geotech geoenvironmental Eng. 2010. 136(12). Pp. 1721–1728.

    15.   Wang, L., Yeung, T.L.K., Lau, A.Y.T., Tsang, D.C.W., Poon, C.S. Recycling contaminated sediment into eco-friendly paving blocks by a combination of binary cement and carbon dioxide curing. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. 164. Pp. 1279–1288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.070

    16.   Qabany, A.Al., Soga, K. Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. In: Bio-and Chemo-Mechanical Processes in Geotechnical Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2013. ICE Publishing, 2014. Pp. 107–115.

    17.   Almurshedi, A.D., Karkush, M. Experimental and numerical modeling of load settlement behavior of gypseous soils improved by MICP. Smart Geotechnics for Smart Societies. CRC Press, 2023. Pp. 583–589. DOI: 10.1201/9781003299127-74

    18.   Wang, Y., Wang, G., Wan, Y., Yu, X., Zhao, J., Shao, J. Recycling of dredged river silt reinforced by an eco-friendly technology as microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP). Soils and Foundations. 2022. 62(6). Article no. 101216. DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101216

    19.   Salman, A.D., Karkush, M., Karim, H. Effect of Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation on Shear Strength of Gypseous Soil in Dry and Soaking Conditions. Geotechnical Engineering and Sustainable Construction. Springer. Singapore, 2022. Pp. 103–114. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-6277-5_9

    20.   Al-Sharrad, M.A. Collapsibility and leaching behavior of an artificial sandy gypseous soil. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 2023. 82(12). Article no. 445. DOI: 10.1007/s10064-023-03465-0

    21.   ASTM D422. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, 2007. 8 p.

    22.   ASTM D4318. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, 2017. 16 p.

    23.   ASTM D854. Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, 2014. 7 p.

    24.   ASTM D2487. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International. West Conshohocken, 2017. 10 p.

    25.   ASTM D698. Standard test method for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International. West Conshohocken, 2012.

    26.   Nemati, M., Greene, E.A., Voordouw, G. Permeability profile modification using bacterially formed calcium carbonate: comparison with enzymic option. Process Biochemistry. 2005. 40(2). Pp. 925–933. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.02.019

    27.   Wei-Soon, Ng., Min-Lee, Lee, Siew-Ling, Hii. An Overview of the Factors Affecting Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation and its Potential Application in Soil Improvement. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering. 2012. 6(2). Pp. 188–194.

    28.   Harkes, M.P., Van Paassen, L.A., Booster, J.L., Whiffin, V.S., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecological Engineering. 2010. 36(2). Pp. 112–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.01.004

    29.   Whiffin, V.S. Microbial CaCO3 Precipitation for the Production of Biocement. PhD Thesis. Perth. Murdoch University, 2004.

    30.   Kalantary, F., Kahani, M. Optimization of the biological soil improvement procedure. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2019. 16(8). Pp. 4231–4240. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-018-1821-9

    31.   FAO. Standard operating procedure for soil calcium carbonate equivalent. Volumetric Calcimeter method. FAO. Rome, 2016. 17 p. URL: http://www.fao.org/3/ca8620en/CA8620EN.pdf (date of application: 20.03.2026).

    32.   ASTM D4373-02. Standard Test Method for Rapid Determination of Carbonate Content of Soil. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, 2007.

    33.   Hemayati, M., Nikooee, E., Habibagahi, G., Niazi, A., Afzali, S.F. New non-ureolytic heterotrophic microbial induced carbonate precipitation for suppression of sand dune wind erosion. Scientific Reports. 2023. 13(1). Article no. 5845. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33070-w

    34.   ASTM D2166. Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, 2016. 7 p.

    35.   Mahawish, A., Bouazza, A., Gates, W.P. Factors affecting the bio-cementing process of coarse sand. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Ground Improvement. 2019. 172(1). Pp. 25–36. DOI: 10.1680/jgrim.17.00039

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article