Adaptive cost-constrained optimization of concrete mixtures using machine learning-guided genetic algorithms

Building Materials
Authors:
Abstract:

This study presents an adaptive framework for optimizing high-performance concrete mixtures by integrating machine learning with a genetic algorithm under cost constraints. An experimental dataset was used to train an XGBoost model, which accurately predicts 28-day compressive strength. The trained machine learning model was embedded as the objective function within the genetic algorithm to maximize compressive strength while incorporating cost limitations defined by user-provided unit prices and budget. Unlike most previous studies that treat cost and strength as two separate objectives in multi-objective formulations, this work introduces cost as a constraint and strength as the sole optimization objective, thereby simplifying the decision-making process. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, an Android application was developed. The application enables users to input real-time material prices and budget limits, which are transmitted to a server hosting the machine learning model and genetic algorithm. The server computes optimized mix proportions and returns both the predicted compressive strength and the optimal design to the user interface. The proposed adaptive optimization framework was shown to effectively adjust to market price fluctuations and varying budget scenarios, providing a practical and flexible solution for real-world applications. Furthermore, the single-objective formulation ensures a unique optimal solution, avoiding the complexity of selecting among multiple Pareto-optimal alternatives.

  • References
    1. Neville, A.M. Properties of concrete. 4th edn. Longman. Essex, 1995. 844 p.
    2. Mehta, P.K., Monteiro, P.J. Concrete microstructure, properties, and materials.: McGraw-Hill. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill. New York, 2006. 684 p.
    3. Abolpour, B., Afsahi, M.M., Hosseini, S.G. Statistical analysis of the effective factors on the 28 days compressive strength and setting time of the concrete. Journal of Advanced Research. 2015. 6(5). Pp. 699–709. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.03.005
    4. Abd Elaty, M.A.A. Compressive strength prediction of Portland cement concrete with age using a new model. HBRC Journal. 2014. 10(2). Pp. 145–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.09.005
    5. Amin, M.N., Iftikhar, B., Kaffayatullah, Kh., and Qadir, M.T. Analyzing the compressive strength, eco-strength, and cost–strength ratio of agro-waste-derived concrete using advanced machine learning methods. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science. 2025. 64(1). Article no. 20250091. DOI: 10.1515/rams-2025-0091
    6. Ramseyer, C.C., Kiamanesh, R. Optimizing Concrete Mix Designs to Produce Cost Effective Paving Mixes. Oklahoma Department of Transportation. 2009. 122 p.
    7. Zheng, W., Zheng, W., Shui, Zh., Xu, Zh., Gao, Xu, Zhang, Sh. Multi-objective optimization of concrete mix design based on machine learning. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023. 76. Article no. 107396. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107396
    8. Tipu, R.K., Panchal, V., Pandya, K. Multi-objective optimized high-strength concrete mix design using a hybrid machine learning and metaheuristic algorithm. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2023. 24(3). Pp. 849–867. DOI: 10.1007/s42107-022-00535-8
    9. Wang, M., Wang, M., Du, M., Zhuang, X., x Lv, X., Wang, Ch., Zh. Multi-objective optimization of ultra-high performance concrete based on life-cycle assessment and machine learning methods. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 2025. 19(1). Pp. 143–161. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-025-1152-0
    10. Zhang, F., Wen, B., Niu, D., Li, A., & Guo, B. Optimized Design of Low-Carbon Mix Ratio for Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II Concrete Based on Genetic Algorithm-Improved Back Propagation. Materials. 2024. 17(16). Article no. 4077. DOI: 10.3390/ma17164077
    11. DeRousseau, M., Kasprzyk, J., Srubar III, W. Multi-objective optimization methods for designing low-carbon concrete mixtures. Frontiers in Materials. 2021. 8. Article no. 680895. DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2021.680895
    12. Wei, J., Zhang, H., Yang, Y., Zhang W., Liu, X. Multi-objective optimization of compressive strength and slump in MPCM-integrated concrete using machine learning. Materials Today Communications. 2025. 46. Article no. 112619. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112619
    13. Gu, Y., Fan, R., Li, Y., Zhao, J., Song, Z., Chu, H. Multi-Objective Optimization for Nano-Silica-Modified Concrete Based on Explainable Machine Learning. Nanomaterials. 2025. 15(18). Article no. 1423. DOI: 10.3390/nano15181423
    14. Chen, F., Xu, W., Wen, Q., Zhang, G., Xu, L., Fan, D., Yu, R. Advancing concrete mix proportion through hybrid intelligence: A multi-objective optimization approach. Materials. 2023. 16(19). Article no. 6448. DOI: 10.3390/ma16196448
    15. Fan, M., Li, Y., Shen., J., J., Kaikai, Shi, J. Multi-objective optimization design of recycled aggregate concrete mixture proportions based on machine learning and NSGA-II algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software. 2024. 192. Article no. 103631. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.103631
    16. Zhang, J., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Ma, G. Multi-objective optimization of concrete mixture proportions using machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms. Construction and Building Materials. 2020. 253. Article no. 119208. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119208
    17. Tipu, R.K., Rathi, P., Pandya, K., Panchal, V.R. Optimizing sustainable blended concrete mixes using deep learning and multi-objective optimization. Scientific Reports. 2025. 15(1). Article no. 16356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-00943-1
    18. Paudel, S., Pudasaini, A., Shrestha, R.K., Kharel, E. Compressive strength of concrete material using machine learning techniques. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2023. 15. Article no. 100661. DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100661
    19. Abbas, Y.M., Khan, M.I. Robust Machine Learning Framework for Modeling the Compressive Strength of SFRC: Database Compilation, Predictive Analysis, and Empirical Verification. Materials. 2023. 16(22). Article no. 7178. DOI: 10.3390/ma16227178
    20. Oviedo, A.I., Londoño, J.M., Vargas, J.F., Zuluaga, C., Gómez, A. Modeling and Optimization of Concrete Mixtures Using Machine Learning Estimators and Genetic Algorithms. Modelling. 2024. 5(3). Article no. 642–658. DOI: 10.3390/modelling5030034
    21. Zuo, S., Liu, B. Optimization design of concrete mix proportion based on support vector machine regression and enhanced genetic algorithm. Discover Applied Sciences. 2025. 7(3). Article no. 200. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-025-06603-3
    22. Yeh, I.-C. Design of high-performance concrete mixture using neural networks and nonlinear programming. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 1999. 13(1). Pp. 36–42.
    23. Ma, M., Tam, V.W., Le, Kh.N., Osei-Kyei, R. Analysing the impacts of key factors on the price of recycled concrete: A system dynamics model. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023. 80. Article no. 108123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108123
    24. Khan, A., Do, J., Kim, D. Cost effective optimal mix proportioning of high strength self compacting concrete using response surface methodology. Computers and Concrete. 2016. 17(5). Pp. 629–638. DOI: 10.12989/cac.2016.17.5.629
    25. Cavusoglu, I. Superplasticizer Dosage Effect on Strength, Microstructure and Permeability Enhancement of Cementitious Paste Fills. Minerals. 2024. 14(12). Article no. 1242. DOI: 10.3390/min14121242
    26. Alsadey, S., Omran, A. Effect of superplasticizers to enhance the properties of concrete. Design, Construction, Maintenance. 2022. 2. Pp. 84–91. DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
    27. Asteris, P.G., et al. AI-powered GUI for prediction of axial compression capacity in concrete-filled steel tube columns. Neural Computing and Applications. 2024. 36(35). Article no. 22429–22459. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-024-10405-w
    28. Li, H., Lin, J., Lei, X., Wei, T. Compressive strength prediction of basalt fiber reinforced concrete via random forest algorithm. Materials Today Communications. 2022. 30. Article no. 103117. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103117
    29. Holand, J.H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. The University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor, MI, 1975. 232 p.
    30. Nukah, P.D., Abbey, S.J., Booth, C.A. Development of a learner model tool for predicting strength and embodied carbon for lightweight concrete production. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024. 95. Article no. 110330. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110330
    31. Abdennaji, T.S., Tipu, R.K., Alassaf, Y. Predicting compressive and tensile strength of concrete with different sand types using machine learning. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2025. 16(8). Article no. 103474. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2025.103474
    32. Golafshani, E., Khodadadi, N., Ngo, T., Nanni, A., Behnood, A. Modelling the compressive strength of geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete using ensemble machine learning. Advances in Engineering Software. 2024. 191. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.103611
    33. Fathy, I.N., Dahish, H.A., Alkharisi, M.K., Mahmoud, A.A., Fouad, H.E.E. Predicting the compressive strength of concrete incorporating waste powders exposed to elevated temperatures utilizing machine learning. Scientific Reports. 2025. 15(1). Article no. 25275. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-11239-9
    34. Shaaban, M., Amin, M., Selim, S., Riad, I.M. Machine learning approaches for forecasting compressive strength of high-strength concrete. Scientific Reports. 2025. 15(1). Article no. 25567. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-10342-1
    35. Chou, J.-S., Chen, L.-Y., Liu, C.-Y. Forensic-based investigation-optimized extreme gradient boosting system for predicting compressive strength of ready-mixed concrete. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering. 2023. 10(1). Pp. 425–445. DOI: 10.1093/jcde/qwac133
    36. Cihan, M.T., Cihan, P. Bayesian-Optimized Ensemble Models for Geopolymer Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction with Interpretability Analysis. Buildings. 2025. 15(20). Article no. 3667. DOI: 10.3390/buildings15203667
    37. Philip, S., Nidhi, N. Compressive strength prediction and feature analysis for GGBS-Based geopolymer concrete using optimized XGBoost and SHAP: A comparative study of optimization algorithms and experimental validation. Journal of Building Engineering. 2025. 108. Article no. 112879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112879
    38. Khan, M.I., Abbas, Y.M., Fares, G., Alqahtani, F. Strength prediction and optimization for ultrahigh-performance concrete with low-carbon cementitious materials – XG boost model and experimental validation. Construction and Building Materials. 2023. 387. Article no. 131606. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131606
    39. Tabani, A., Sharma, A., Biswas, R., Sivenas, T., Asteris, P.G. Revealing the nature of Ultra-High-Performance concrete using computational intelligence. Construction and Building Materials. 2025. 492. Article no. 143082. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143082
    40. Al-Naghi, A.A., Ahmad, A., Amin, M.N., Algassem, O., Alnawmasi, N. Sustainable optimisation of GGBS-based concrete: De-risking mix design through predictive machine learning models. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2025. 23. Article no. e04900. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04900
    41. Cakiroglu, C., Batool, F., Sangi, A.J., Fatima, B., Nehdi, M.L. Explainable machine learning predictive model for mechanical strength of recycled ceramic tile-based concrete. Materials Today Communications. 2025. 44. Article no. 112139. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112139
    42. Ehsan, K., Mohamed, A.H., Inqiad, W.B., Javed, M.A., Iqbal, I. Multi expression programming and interpretable machine learning for determining compressive strength of coral sand aggregate concrete. Materials Today Communications. 2025. 45. Article no. 112370. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112370
    43. Hamed, A.K., Elshaarawy, M.K., Alsaadawi, M.M. Stacked-based machine learning to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of concrete materials. Computers and Structures. 2025. 308. Article no. 107644. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2025.107644
    44. Abushanab, A., Vimonsatit, V. Compressive strength, flexural strength, and slump of recycled aggregate fibre-reinforced fly ash concrete using explainable extreme gradient boosting machine learning model with prediction tool. Powder Technology. 2025. 469(1). Article no. 121710. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2025.121710
    45. Alahmari, T.S., Arif, K. Machine learning approaches to predict the strength of graphene nanoplatelets concrete: Optimization and hyper tuning with graphical user interface. Materials Today Communications. 2024. 40. Article no. 109946. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109946
    46. Kapil, A., Jadda, K., Jee, A.A. Developing machine learning models to predict the fly ash concrete compressive strength. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2024. 25(7). Article no. 5505–5523. DOI: 10.1007/s42107-024-01125-6
    47. Javed, M.F., Fawad, M., Lodhi, R., Najeh, T., Gamil, Y. Forecasting the strength of preplaced aggregate concrete using interpretable machine learning approaches. Scientific Reports. 2024. 14(1). Article no. 8381. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57896-0
    48. Khatoon, S., K, K.A., Sapkota, S.C. Experimental insights and hybridized ensemble machine learning validation of fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete strength. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2026. 27. Pp. 1289–1312. DOI: 10.1007/s42107-025-01562-x
    49. Li, T., Yang, J., Jiang, P., Abuhussain, M.A., Zaman, A., Fawad, M., Farooq, F. Forecasting the strength of nanocomposite concrete containing carbon nanotubes by interpretable machine learning approaches with graphical user interface. Structures. 2024. 59. Article no. 105821. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105821
    50. Liu, X., Mei, Sh., Wang, X., Li, X. Estimation of compressive strength of concrete with manufactured sand and natural sand using interpretable artificial intelligence. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2024. 21. Article no. e03840. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03840
    51. Nguyen, N.H., Abellán-García, J., Lee, S., Garcia-Castano, E, Vo. Th.P. Efficient estimating compressive strength of ultra-high performance concrete using XGBoost model. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022. 52. Article no. 104302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104302
    52. Sun, Y. Explainable Prediction of Compressive Strength and Elastic Modulus for Concrete Containing Waste Foundry Sand Using Bayesian-Optimized XGBoost with 10-Fold Cross-Validation. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy. 2024. 10(1). Pp. 335–359. DOI: 10.1007/s40831-024-00790-w
    53. Singh, S., Patro, S.K., Parhi, S.K. Evolutionary optimization of machine learning algorithm hyperparameters for strength prediction of high-performance concrete. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2023. 24(8). Pp. 3121–3143. DOI: 10.1007/s42107-023-00698-y
    54. Sun, Y. Estimation of compressive strength for spiral stirrup-confined circular concrete column using optimized machine learning with interpretable techniques. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 2024. 31(28). Pp. 10839–10858. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2298232
    55. Ullah, A., Yang,Y., Ullah, W., Ayub, B., Alzlfawi, A., Iqbal, I. Toward transparent AI: Predicting strength of fly ash foam composite concrete using explainable ML models. Structural Concrete. 2025. 27(1). Pp. 595–624. DOI: 10.1002/suco.70302
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous article